The New Gun Performance Tuning Tools
Some of these are old familiar caching apps with added tuning features. Others have branched out of database optimization and added broader tuning capbilities. Here is a list of the new Performance Tuning tools – can they deliver top results?
The only good news is that CLS value is very good at zero shift. But hidden from view is the 7 seccond Fully Load time. So clearly the landing page can use some performance tuning work.
If you read the WordPress Performance tuning reports, a consensus is forming around the basic processes:
- Web HostingServices are getting better but improvements in hosting can be reflected in 10% to 70% better response time.;
- Next compressing images and separately videos with lossy but still quality media renderings can often deliver 20% to 50% better response time;
- Database Optimizing plugins reduce the size of the intial database load . But again, many database plugins offer caching and minification services;;
- Conditional Component Usage plugins are the latest step in page/post speed optimiation. Again, depending on plugins these tools can deliver;
- Finally there is a whole array of mobile specific optimizations really shaking up WordPress delivery.on small screens.
The dashboard is easy to use and provides helpful tooltip hints for most of the settings.
Missing from this tuning run is no image lazy loading, no purge of unused images and most important no unused asset clean-up.
The fact that I could not connect back to either the Settings Dashboard nor to the Setup Wizard is a fundamental problem to be fixed,
Lazy loading and image compression are the two missing tuning features.
LiteSpeed Cache has an easy to use point and click settings dashboard.
This is similar to the SiteGround Optimizer which only works with websites using SiteGround Web Hosting Services.
W3 Total Cache has a suprb Setup Guide which rescues the confusing setup dashboard and overfilled menubar subcommands. And the number of upgrade nags is atrocious. Fortunately basic plugin delivers good performance
Even without image compression or asset cleanup, W3 Total Cache delivers a solid performance improvement with onload time at 1.3 sec and fully loaded 3.3second.
Hummingbird has a point and click dashboard for all the key settings with tooltip hints for some options. But switching between dashboard pages was 4-8 seconds slow.
Hummingbird delivers one of the fastest tuning tests of 1.2 sec TTI Time To Interactive. All this without using the integrated CDN nor any asset cleanup tool.
WpRocket, follows the point and click approached used by amost all of the Performance tools, but switching between dashboard pages was 4-8 seconds slow.
WPRocket posts median LCP time but good TBT and very fast Time To Interfactive and Full load
Combo Test combines 3 Performance plugins that fill in each others shortcomings – WPFastest Cache with a 5 WP rating from 3577 users on 1 million active sites, Autoptimize with a 4.4 WP rating from 1282 users on 1 million active sites, and WP Performance Score Booster with a 4.4 WP rating from 313 user on 30K sites.. This combo was used on another client site about a year ago to good effect.
WP Fastest Cache has patched a XSS fault with its upated 0.95 version. The plugin has links to missing image compression and CDN services [low/no cost options] .
Autoptimize setup uses a point and click accordion with links to caching, CDN, and other tuning tools
WP Performance Score Booster has a simple setup with offers for added tuning options. But the options for GZIP compression, browser caching and page preloading are just the Booster shots required.
Combo plugins runtime was a bit slow with good TBT and very fast Time To Interfactive but the Full Load Time at 3.3sec was median
From the outset there are 3 factors that have effected the Performance testing:
- For testing a Boldgrid Cloud Instance [17th of 40] was used and the shared hosting delays of 500 to 700msec were apparent in all the Waterfall reports;
- Given that images were 90% of the page load and 32% of page requests they played a major role in the testing. The WP-Optimize Smush compressioons were locked in for all of the tests. This means all of the image compression settings were uniform for all the tests. Yes, this means superior image compression capabilities were missed[ for example, use of WebP or AVIF file formats of some ttuning options ]. However, each tool’s lazy loading of images were part of the tests;
- Two Optimization factors, CDN-Content Delivery Network options and Asset Cleanup routines were barely tested.